<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 329 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86107</link>
    <description>A refund claim filed within limitation under Section 11B could not be rejected solely because exemption under Notification No. 175/86 had not been claimed in the classification list. The Tribunal held that Sections 11A and 11B operate independently for demand and refund of duty, and that approval of a classification list does not bar examination of a timely refund claim based on alleged erroneous payment of duty and entitlement to exemption. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 329 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86107</link>
      <description>A refund claim filed within limitation under Section 11B could not be rejected solely because exemption under Notification No. 175/86 had not been claimed in the classification list. The Tribunal held that Sections 11A and 11B operate independently for demand and refund of duty, and that approval of a classification list does not bar examination of a timely refund claim based on alleged erroneous payment of duty and entitlement to exemption. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>