<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (10) TMI 180 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86099</link>
    <description>Octroi was payable only when goods entered the local area for use, consumption, or sale there, and mere physical entry for transhipment or export did not attract the levy. Transfer of Horlicks powder from bulk drums into bottles for removal outside municipal limits was therefore not use or consumption within the city, so the tax collected on that exported portion was not retainable. The Court also treated the refund procedure in the bye-laws as procedural only; non-compliance with that procedure could not defeat restitution where the levy itself was unauthorised. Amounts collected without authority of law could not be retained, and Article 265 barred such collection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (10) TMI 180 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86099</link>
      <description>Octroi was payable only when goods entered the local area for use, consumption, or sale there, and mere physical entry for transhipment or export did not attract the levy. Transfer of Horlicks powder from bulk drums into bottles for removal outside municipal limits was therefore not use or consumption within the city, so the tax collected on that exported portion was not retainable. The Court also treated the refund procedure in the bye-laws as procedural only; non-compliance with that procedure could not defeat restitution where the levy itself was unauthorised. Amounts collected without authority of law could not be retained, and Article 265 barred such collection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>