https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86080 The Tribunal held that the communication dated 28-7-1981, despite deficiencies, constituted an appealable order. Failure to challenge it rendered subsequent actions ineffective. The appeal against the communication was dismissed as time-barred, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals. Non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements initially led to dismissal, but subsequent compliance was accepted, allowing for a remand. The decision of 28-7-1981 merged with a later decision, necessitating a comprehensive review. The Tribunal remanded for a fresh decision on merits, granting the appellants the opportunity for submissions within three months. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:10:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86080 The Tribunal held that the communication dated 28-7-1981, despite deficiencies, constituted an appealable order. Failure to challenge it rendered subsequent actions ineffective. The appeal against the communication was dismissed as time-barred, emphasizing the importance of timely appeals. Non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements initially led to dismissal, but subsequent compliance was accepted, allowing for a remand. The decision of 28-7-1981 merged with a later decision, necessitating a comprehensive review. The Tribunal remanded for a fresh decision on merits, granting the appellants the opportunity for submissions within three months. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86080