<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 144 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the 7.5% discount passed on to wholesalers for direct sales to sub-dealers should be deducted from the wholesale price to determine the assessable value. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal concluded that deviations for commercial reasons did not change the nature of the discount, treating it as an allowable trade discount. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 144 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the 7.5% discount passed on to wholesalers for direct sales to sub-dealers should be deducted from the wholesale price to determine the assessable value. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal concluded that deviations for commercial reasons did not change the nature of the discount, treating it as an allowable trade discount. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>