<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 143 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86070</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the rejection of the refund claim unjustified and ordering a reconsideration by the Assistant Collector. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following proper legal procedures, particularly in refund claims under Sections 11A and 11B of the Act, to ensure fairness for both the Revenue and the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 143 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86070</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the rejection of the refund claim unjustified and ordering a reconsideration by the Assistant Collector. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following proper legal procedures, particularly in refund claims under Sections 11A and 11B of the Act, to ensure fairness for both the Revenue and the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>