<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 133 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal stated that its inherent power to stay proceedings before lower authorities exists only in rare cases and cannot be used routinely in a classification dispute. An earlier stay of the appeal before the Tribunal did not amount to a direction for provisional assessment of future clearances, and the department remained free to assess goods in accordance with law. It also held that the statutory interest position could not be bypassed by seeking a stay of adjudication proceedings. On that basis, the request for stay of the Collector&#039;s adjudication proceedings was refused and the application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:03:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 133 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal stated that its inherent power to stay proceedings before lower authorities exists only in rare cases and cannot be used routinely in a classification dispute. An earlier stay of the appeal before the Tribunal did not amount to a direction for provisional assessment of future clearances, and the department remained free to assess goods in accordance with law. It also held that the statutory interest position could not be bypassed by seeking a stay of adjudication proceedings. On that basis, the request for stay of the Collector&#039;s adjudication proceedings was refused and the application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>