<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 233 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86018</link>
    <description>Clearances made under an earlier exemption notification were countable towards the Rs. 20 lakh ceiling under Notification No. 178/85 because that notification contained no exclusion for clearances already exempted under another scheme; the assessee was therefore not entitled to that exemption for the disputed period. Under Notification No. 77/85, however, clearances exempted under Notification No. 46/81 were excluded from computation because the earlier notification was not based on a financial-year value or quantity limit, and the disputed clearances then fell below the threshold. The duty demand was unsustainable, and exemption relief was available for the disputed clearances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:14:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 233 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86018</link>
      <description>Clearances made under an earlier exemption notification were countable towards the Rs. 20 lakh ceiling under Notification No. 178/85 because that notification contained no exclusion for clearances already exempted under another scheme; the assessee was therefore not entitled to that exemption for the disputed period. Under Notification No. 77/85, however, clearances exempted under Notification No. 46/81 were excluded from computation because the earlier notification was not based on a financial-year value or quantity limit, and the disputed clearances then fell below the threshold. The duty demand was unsustainable, and exemption relief was available for the disputed clearances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>