<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 324 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85981</link>
    <description>Documentary evidence showing receipt of the imported goods at Bangalore, together with closure of the three DEEC books, supported a prima facie case for interim relief. The record was treated as indicating that the procedure contemplated in the Handbook of Procedure had been followed, and the adverse departmental statement was given limited weight at the pre-deposit stage. On that basis, unconditional stay against recovery was granted, along with waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:27:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 324 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85981</link>
      <description>Documentary evidence showing receipt of the imported goods at Bangalore, together with closure of the three DEEC books, supported a prima facie case for interim relief. The record was treated as indicating that the procedure contemplated in the Handbook of Procedure had been followed, and the adverse departmental statement was given limited weight at the pre-deposit stage. On that basis, unconditional stay against recovery was granted, along with waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>