<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85962</link>
    <description>Caulking compound treated on the evidence as asphalt mix qualified for exemption under Notification No. 76/86-C.E. because asphalt mix was expressly listed in the Schedule to the notification. The chemical test report and technical literature supported that description, so the competing tariff classification proposed by the department did not defeat the exemption claim. Where a product squarely answers the description of an item specifically included in an exemption notification, the exemption applies despite a different classification contention. The duty benefit was therefore accepted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85962</link>
      <description>Caulking compound treated on the evidence as asphalt mix qualified for exemption under Notification No. 76/86-C.E. because asphalt mix was expressly listed in the Schedule to the notification. The chemical test report and technical literature supported that description, so the competing tariff classification proposed by the department did not defeat the exemption claim. Where a product squarely answers the description of an item specifically included in an exemption notification, the exemption applies despite a different classification contention. The duty benefit was therefore accepted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>