<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 209 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable despite the lack of explicit grounds in the authorization by the Collector of Central Excise. Emphasizing the Collector&#039;s application of mind, the Tribunal rejected the challenge, citing past decisions. The case underscores the significance of procedural compliance and legal principles in determining the validity of appeals concerning central excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 209 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable despite the lack of explicit grounds in the authorization by the Collector of Central Excise. Emphasizing the Collector&#039;s application of mind, the Tribunal rejected the challenge, citing past decisions. The case underscores the significance of procedural compliance and legal principles in determining the validity of appeals concerning central excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>