<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85948</link>
    <description>Freight paid under the contract and later refunded as despatch money was treated as reducing the effective freight cost, so the refunded amount was not includible in the assessable value for customs duty. On that basis, the excess duty paid was refundable and the refund claim was maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85948</link>
      <description>Freight paid under the contract and later refunded as despatch money was treated as reducing the effective freight cost, so the refunded amount was not includible in the assessable value for customs duty. On that basis, the excess duty paid was refundable and the refund claim was maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>