<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85936</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the invoice was issued by a dealer who had not been specifically appointed or registered by the manufacturer. Notification No. 15/94 accepted invoices issued by a manufacturer, wholesale distributor, or dealer of a manufacturer for goods bought from the manufacturer at the factory or depot, and it did not then impose prior authorisation or registration as a condition. As the goods were purchased directly from the manufacturer and the invoice chain was undisputed, the notification and the definition of wholesale dealer were correctly applied, and credit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85936</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the invoice was issued by a dealer who had not been specifically appointed or registered by the manufacturer. Notification No. 15/94 accepted invoices issued by a manufacturer, wholesale distributor, or dealer of a manufacturer for goods bought from the manufacturer at the factory or depot, and it did not then impose prior authorisation or registration as a condition. As the goods were purchased directly from the manufacturer and the invoice chain was undisputed, the notification and the definition of wholesale dealer were correctly applied, and credit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>