<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 343 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85935</link>
    <description>Classification of rough, unmachined and unlinned forged dished ends turns on whether they remain iron and steel products covered by the specific tariff entry. Item No. 25 covered iron and steel and products thereof, with the phrase &quot;such as&quot; making the listed forms illustrative rather than exhaustive. Article shape was not determinative where the goods retained the character of iron and steel products. The residuary Item No. 68 applied only where no specific tariff classification was available. Dished ends therefore fell under Item No. 25(13)(iv), notwithstanding that further processing was required before use, rather than under the residuary entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 343 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85935</link>
      <description>Classification of rough, unmachined and unlinned forged dished ends turns on whether they remain iron and steel products covered by the specific tariff entry. Item No. 25 covered iron and steel and products thereof, with the phrase &quot;such as&quot; making the listed forms illustrative rather than exhaustive. Article shape was not determinative where the goods retained the character of iron and steel products. The residuary Item No. 68 applied only where no specific tariff classification was available. Dished ends therefore fell under Item No. 25(13)(iv), notwithstanding that further processing was required before use, rather than under the residuary entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>