<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 336 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85928</link>
    <description>An automatic multi-station machine described in the invoice and catalogue as a bolt or nut making machine qualified for concessional assessment under the relevant exemption entry because its essential character was that of a bolt or nut making machine. The fact that it was capable of additional functions, or had been tooled for making other products, did not displace its classification for exemption purposes. The operative test was the machine&#039;s fundamental description within the notified class, not its incidental versatility. On that basis, the exemption was held applicable and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:09:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 336 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85928</link>
      <description>An automatic multi-station machine described in the invoice and catalogue as a bolt or nut making machine qualified for concessional assessment under the relevant exemption entry because its essential character was that of a bolt or nut making machine. The fact that it was capable of additional functions, or had been tooled for making other products, did not displace its classification for exemption purposes. The operative test was the machine&#039;s fundamental description within the notified class, not its incidental versatility. On that basis, the exemption was held applicable and the departmental challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>