<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 289 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85912</link>
    <description>Where goods are sold on a principal-to-principal basis and the buyer acquires proprietary interest and may incur promotion expenses, distributor-incurred advertising costs after removal do not form part of the manufacturer&#039;s assessable value absent contractual consent or statutory mandate; similarly, a distributor is not a &quot;related person&quot; for valuation purposes merely because of familial links among directors/partners unless the statutory definition is satisfied and the proviso requiring adoption of the related person&#039;s price is properly applied. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:39:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 289 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85912</link>
      <description>Where goods are sold on a principal-to-principal basis and the buyer acquires proprietary interest and may incur promotion expenses, distributor-incurred advertising costs after removal do not form part of the manufacturer&#039;s assessable value absent contractual consent or statutory mandate; similarly, a distributor is not a &quot;related person&quot; for valuation purposes merely because of familial links among directors/partners unless the statutory definition is satisfied and the proviso requiring adoption of the related person&#039;s price is properly applied. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>