https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85857 The Tribunal held that the appeals were maintainable under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as amended. It acknowledged its inherent power to pass orders to ensure justice but did not grant a stay, opting for an expedited hearing of the appeals regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Acrylonitrile-Butadiene Rubber (NBR) imported from Japan. The stay applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:31:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85857 The Tribunal held that the appeals were maintainable under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as amended. It acknowledged its inherent power to pass orders to ensure justice but did not grant a stay, opting for an expedited hearing of the appeals regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Acrylonitrile-Butadiene Rubber (NBR) imported from Japan. The stay applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 30 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85857