<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 156 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85842</link>
    <description>Clearances exempted under Notification No. 167/79 were not required to be included in aggregate turnover for the small-scale exemption under Notification No. 213/86, because the earlier notification granted a conditional exemption without linking relief to the value or quantity of clearances in a financial year. Explanation II(a) to Notification No. 213/86 excluded only clearances under nil-duty or fully exempt notifications, except where the exemption itself depended on annual value or quantity thresholds. As Notification No. 167/79 did not fall within that exception, its clearances remained outside the computation base, and the assessee could claim the exemption under Notification No. 213/86.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 156 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85842</link>
      <description>Clearances exempted under Notification No. 167/79 were not required to be included in aggregate turnover for the small-scale exemption under Notification No. 213/86, because the earlier notification granted a conditional exemption without linking relief to the value or quantity of clearances in a financial year. Explanation II(a) to Notification No. 213/86 excluded only clearances under nil-duty or fully exempt notifications, except where the exemption itself depended on annual value or quantity thresholds. As Notification No. 167/79 did not fall within that exception, its clearances remained outside the computation base, and the assessee could claim the exemption under Notification No. 213/86.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>