<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 292 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85821</link>
    <description>Sales tax paid on raw materials forms part of their cost for valuing intermediate products under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975, and cannot be excluded without a record-based legal basis. The tribunal found no justification for deducting only 50% of the sales tax, so the assessee&#039;s claim for that deduction was rejected. It also declined to consider any further exclusion of the remaining 50% in the absence of an appeal by the Department. The assessee&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 292 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85821</link>
      <description>Sales tax paid on raw materials forms part of their cost for valuing intermediate products under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975, and cannot be excluded without a record-based legal basis. The tribunal found no justification for deducting only 50% of the sales tax, so the assessee&#039;s claim for that deduction was rejected. It also declined to consider any further exclusion of the remaining 50% in the absence of an appeal by the Department. The assessee&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>