<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 286 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85815</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order and instructed the Additional Commissioner to reevaluate the assessable value, confiscation, and penalty within four months. The judgment concluded that the appellant violated the Import and Export Control Act, 1947, and rejected the invoice price. The decision to remand the case for reassessment emphasized the importance of accurate declaration and valuation of imported goods to prevent customs duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:09:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 286 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85815</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order and instructed the Additional Commissioner to reevaluate the assessable value, confiscation, and penalty within four months. The judgment concluded that the appellant violated the Import and Export Control Act, 1947, and rejected the invoice price. The decision to remand the case for reassessment emphasized the importance of accurate declaration and valuation of imported goods to prevent customs duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>