<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 250 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85781</link>
    <description>Imported copper tubes claimed for refrigeration use were found capable of multiple household and industrial applications, and were not shown to be exclusively meant for refrigeration equipment. Because the catalogue, invoices and form of import indicated that further cutting and fabrication were required before use, the special heading for refrigeration goods was not accepted. The classification under Heading 74.07/08(1) was upheld, and the claim for refund and exemption failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 250 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85781</link>
      <description>Imported copper tubes claimed for refrigeration use were found capable of multiple household and industrial applications, and were not shown to be exclusively meant for refrigeration equipment. Because the catalogue, invoices and form of import indicated that further cutting and fabrication were required before use, the special heading for refrigeration goods was not accepted. The classification under Heading 74.07/08(1) was upheld, and the claim for refund and exemption failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>