<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85752</link>
    <description>The mere fact that two partners of the buying concern were relatives of the managing director, and that both concerns operated from the same building, was held insufficient to prove that they were related persons or that the sales were anything other than principal-to-principal transactions. In the absence of evidence of extra commercial consideration, special favour, or direct or indirect interest in each other&#039;s business, valuation could not be based on the buyer&#039;s resale price adopted by the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 18:26:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85752</link>
      <description>The mere fact that two partners of the buying concern were relatives of the managing director, and that both concerns operated from the same building, was held insufficient to prove that they were related persons or that the sales were anything other than principal-to-principal transactions. In the absence of evidence of extra commercial consideration, special favour, or direct or indirect interest in each other&#039;s business, valuation could not be based on the buyer&#039;s resale price adopted by the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>