<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85736</link>
    <description>Insurance charges attributable to customs duty payable after importation were not includible in the assessable value of imported goods. The assessable value was confined to the value up to importation, including invoice value and landing charges, and the additional insurance linked only to post-import duty liability was treated as outside CIF value and landed cost. On that basis, the refund claim was stated to succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 17:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 259 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85736</link>
      <description>Insurance charges attributable to customs duty payable after importation were not includible in the assessable value of imported goods. The assessable value was confined to the value up to importation, including invoice value and landing charges, and the additional insurance linked only to post-import duty liability was treated as outside CIF value and landed cost. On that basis, the refund claim was stated to succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>