<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85725</link>
    <description>Coated paper for offset plates classified under Heading 4809.90 was treated as falling within the exclusion for coated paper, transfer paper and similar products under Notification No. 44/86. The notification extended exemption to paper and paper boards under Chapter 48, but the exclusion clause was read broadly to cover transfer papers used for offset plates as well. On that construction, the product did not qualify for exemption and the claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 17:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85725</link>
      <description>Coated paper for offset plates classified under Heading 4809.90 was treated as falling within the exclusion for coated paper, transfer paper and similar products under Notification No. 44/86. The notification extended exemption to paper and paper boards under Chapter 48, but the exclusion clause was read broadly to cover transfer papers used for offset plates as well. On that construction, the product did not qualify for exemption and the claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>