<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 246 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 2.335 M.T. of M.S. Bars but reduced the fine and penalty imposed. However, the confiscation of the truck was set aside due to the absence of a show cause notice to the owner. The disproportionate fine imposed on the truck owner was highlighted, leading to the owner&#039;s appeal being allowed. The appellants were entitled to consequential relief as per the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 17:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 246 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 2.335 M.T. of M.S. Bars but reduced the fine and penalty imposed. However, the confiscation of the truck was set aside due to the absence of a show cause notice to the owner. The disproportionate fine imposed on the truck owner was highlighted, leading to the owner&#039;s appeal being allowed. The appellants were entitled to consequential relief as per the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>