<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 231 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85709</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Madras dismissed the appeal regarding the grant of refund for goods warehoused under Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that individuals warehousing goods are obligated to pay duty under Section 72(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, making the question of refund inapplicable. Therefore, the appellant&#039;s argument that the loss of goods in the warehouse should be covered under Section 23 was deemed lacking in merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 231 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85709</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Madras dismissed the appeal regarding the grant of refund for goods warehoused under Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that individuals warehousing goods are obligated to pay duty under Section 72(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, making the question of refund inapplicable. Therefore, the appellant&#039;s argument that the loss of goods in the warehouse should be covered under Section 23 was deemed lacking in merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>