<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85701</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on polypropylene resin was admissible because the declarations on record disclosed the input and the final product, and the absence of a separate linkage for metallised film was treated as a technical objection inconsistent with the manufacturing process. Credit on evaporation boats and graphite foils was correctly denied because they functioned as tools or equipment rather than inputs used in manufacture. Credit on masking band was admissible because it directly participated in the deposition process and was not merely an appliance. The penalty was reduced proportionately in view of the partial relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85701</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on polypropylene resin was admissible because the declarations on record disclosed the input and the final product, and the absence of a separate linkage for metallised film was treated as a technical objection inconsistent with the manufacturing process. Credit on evaporation boats and graphite foils was correctly denied because they functioned as tools or equipment rather than inputs used in manufacture. Credit on masking band was admissible because it directly participated in the deposition process and was not merely an appliance. The penalty was reduced proportionately in view of the partial relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>