<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 331 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85687</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039; decision that the appeal was time-barred due to the review order being passed after the limitation period. The Tribunal emphasized that the initial refund order dated 5-4-1990 was the effective order for calculating the limitation period under Section 35E(3) of the Act, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal based on correct statutory interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:41:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 331 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85687</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)&#039; decision that the appeal was time-barred due to the review order being passed after the limitation period. The Tribunal emphasized that the initial refund order dated 5-4-1990 was the effective order for calculating the limitation period under Section 35E(3) of the Act, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeal based on correct statutory interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>