<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 327 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85683</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the demand for wrongly taken credit on printed aluminium collapsible tubes was time-barred. As a result, the demand was deemed unsustainable, and the penalty imposition of Rs. 10,000 was overturned. The order-in-original was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:21:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 327 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85683</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the demand for wrongly taken credit on printed aluminium collapsible tubes was time-barred. As a result, the demand was deemed unsustainable, and the penalty imposition of Rs. 10,000 was overturned. The order-in-original was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>