<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 325 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85681</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit waiver for disputed Modvat credit on hot-tops and refractory bricks depended on the differing prima facie strength of the claims. Credit relating to hot-tops was treated as having a prima facie basis, whereas the claim for fire bricks was not similarly supported. The admissibility of Modvat credit under Rule 57A remained for determination in the main appeal. Conditional relief required a deposit within six weeks; upon compliance, the remaining pre-deposit was waived and the challenged order was stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:19:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 325 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85681</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit waiver for disputed Modvat credit on hot-tops and refractory bricks depended on the differing prima facie strength of the claims. Credit relating to hot-tops was treated as having a prima facie basis, whereas the claim for fire bricks was not similarly supported. The admissibility of Modvat credit under Rule 57A remained for determination in the main appeal. Conditional relief required a deposit within six weeks; upon compliance, the remaining pre-deposit was waived and the challenged order was stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>