<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 232 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85648</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted conditionally in a Modvat credit dispute because the demand required detailed scrutiny and the alleged supplier-side fraud made invocation of the extended period under Rule 57-I debatable. At the prima facie stage, the decisive question was whether duty had in fact been paid to the Government exchequer; any payment to suppliers would, at most, create civil consequences. As the factual position had to be examined finally, the demanded amount was to be secured by retention in the Modvat account, with a bank guarantee required only for any shortfall.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 13:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 232 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85648</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted conditionally in a Modvat credit dispute because the demand required detailed scrutiny and the alleged supplier-side fraud made invocation of the extended period under Rule 57-I debatable. At the prima facie stage, the decisive question was whether duty had in fact been paid to the Government exchequer; any payment to suppliers would, at most, create civil consequences. As the factual position had to be examined finally, the demanded amount was to be secured by retention in the Modvat account, with a bank guarantee required only for any shortfall.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>