<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 298 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85620</link>
    <description>Sequins manufactured from duty-paid PVC films were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 53/88-C.E. because the films themselves were made from duty-paid PVC resin falling within the relevant tariff headings. The exemption condition was regarded as satisfied where the basic raw material used in the manufacture of the finished product was duty-paid, and the presence of an intermediate manufacturing stage did not defeat the claim. Departmental clarification and Tribunal precedent were relied on to support the view that exemption cannot be denied merely because the product passed through an intermediate form before becoming the final goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:16:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 298 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85620</link>
      <description>Sequins manufactured from duty-paid PVC films were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 53/88-C.E. because the films themselves were made from duty-paid PVC resin falling within the relevant tariff headings. The exemption condition was regarded as satisfied where the basic raw material used in the manufacture of the finished product was duty-paid, and the presence of an intermediate manufacturing stage did not defeat the claim. Departmental clarification and Tribunal precedent were relied on to support the view that exemption cannot be denied merely because the product passed through an intermediate form before becoming the final goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>