<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 297 - CEGAT, MUMBAI-I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85619</link>
    <description>Delayed production of end-use certificates did not, by itself, defeat an import exemption where the certificates were ultimately furnished and verified. The procedural lapse was treated as curable because the substantive condition for the exemption was considered satisfied, and the duty demand was therefore unsustainable on that basis. The department retained the right to verify the certificates and, if they were later found unacceptable, to take fresh action in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 297 - CEGAT, MUMBAI-I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85619</link>
      <description>Delayed production of end-use certificates did not, by itself, defeat an import exemption where the certificates were ultimately furnished and verified. The procedural lapse was treated as curable because the substantive condition for the exemption was considered satisfied, and the duty demand was therefore unsustainable on that basis. The department retained the right to verify the certificates and, if they were later found unacceptable, to take fresh action in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>