<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 296 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85618</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to review orders on export rebate claims under Section 35B of CESA, 1944. The appeal was directed to be pursued in the appropriate forum, and the papers were to be returned to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 296 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85618</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to review orders on export rebate claims under Section 35B of CESA, 1944. The appeal was directed to be pursued in the appropriate forum, and the papers were to be returned to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>