<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 200 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the differential duty demanded on imported goods due to a time-barred show-cause notice served after the six-month period from duty payment. The appeal was partially allowed, confirming the order in other aspects, emphasizing the importance of timely issuance and service of show-cause notices under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 200 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the differential duty demanded on imported goods due to a time-barred show-cause notice served after the six-month period from duty payment. The appeal was partially allowed, confirming the order in other aspects, emphasizing the importance of timely issuance and service of show-cause notices under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>