<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 298 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85550</link>
    <description>The tribunal determined that duty should be charged on single ply yarn at the spindle stage, rejecting the argument that duty collection should occur after additional processes like winding, doubling, and reeling. The decision was based on single ply yarn being recognized as a marketable product at the spindle stage, aligning with common parlance and legal provisions. The tribunal emphasized that processes after the spindle stage do not impact duty determination, upholding the department&#039;s position and ruling in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:22:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 298 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85550</link>
      <description>The tribunal determined that duty should be charged on single ply yarn at the spindle stage, rejecting the argument that duty collection should occur after additional processes like winding, doubling, and reeling. The decision was based on single ply yarn being recognized as a marketable product at the spindle stage, aligning with common parlance and legal provisions. The tribunal emphasized that processes after the spindle stage do not impact duty determination, upholding the department&#039;s position and ruling in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>