<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 290 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85542</link>
    <description>Declared invoice value for an imported second-hand car may be rejected where it does not reflect the correct assessable value, including omitted reconditioning and freight charges; valuation is then to be redetermined on the accepted basis with reference to the World Car Catalogue price and appropriate adjustments. On depreciation, the original allowance of 46% was found inadequate for a 1984 model imported in 1989, and later beneficial governmental instructions increasing the permissible depreciation for second-hand cars were applied, requiring a revised allowance of 52%. The assessment was sustained in principle, but the assessable value had to be revised, granting partial relief to the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:11:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 290 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85542</link>
      <description>Declared invoice value for an imported second-hand car may be rejected where it does not reflect the correct assessable value, including omitted reconditioning and freight charges; valuation is then to be redetermined on the accepted basis with reference to the World Car Catalogue price and appropriate adjustments. On depreciation, the original allowance of 46% was found inadequate for a 1984 model imported in 1989, and later beneficial governmental instructions increasing the permissible depreciation for second-hand cars were applied, requiring a revised allowance of 52%. The assessment was sustained in principle, but the assessable value had to be revised, granting partial relief to the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>