<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85536</link>
    <description>In final customs assessment, landing charges are to be included on a notional basis for valuation, and actual landing charges are not substituted merely because they are later available. The Tribunal distinguished provisional assessment cases, where actual figures may be used before regular assessment is completed. On that basis, a refund claim founded on actual landing charges was not sustainable, and the refund order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:48:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85536</link>
      <description>In final customs assessment, landing charges are to be included on a notional basis for valuation, and actual landing charges are not substituted merely because they are later available. The Tribunal distinguished provisional assessment cases, where actual figures may be used before regular assessment is completed. On that basis, a refund claim founded on actual landing charges was not sustainable, and the refund order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>