<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85525</link>
    <description>Questions of law concerning entitlement to Modvat credit on inputs used in goods cleared at nil rate of duty, and the interaction of Rules 57A and 57C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, were considered in light of earlier conflicting Tribunal and High Court views. Because a similar reference on analogous issues had already been made in another matter, the listed legal questions were referred to the High Court under section 35G(1). The reference application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 272 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85525</link>
      <description>Questions of law concerning entitlement to Modvat credit on inputs used in goods cleared at nil rate of duty, and the interaction of Rules 57A and 57C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, were considered in light of earlier conflicting Tribunal and High Court views. Because a similar reference on analogous issues had already been made in another matter, the listed legal questions were referred to the High Court under section 35G(1). The reference application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>