<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85518</link>
    <description>Clearances by independent outside manufacturers could not be added to the respondent&#039;s clearances for eligibility under Notification No. 77/85-C.E. because the record showed no evidence that those units were dummy units or hired labour for the respondent. Mere supply of raw materials, or invoicing arrangements, was insufficient to justify clubbing their turnover with the respondent&#039;s value of clearances. The exemption therefore remained available on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:53:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85518</link>
      <description>Clearances by independent outside manufacturers could not be added to the respondent&#039;s clearances for eligibility under Notification No. 77/85-C.E. because the record showed no evidence that those units were dummy units or hired labour for the respondent. Mere supply of raw materials, or invoicing arrangements, was insufficient to justify clubbing their turnover with the respondent&#039;s value of clearances. The exemption therefore remained available on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>