<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85504</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on carbon electrodes and nipples was held admissible where the later declaration filed under Rule 57G(5) covered the inputs received during the relevant period. A declaration for graphite electrodes was not enough to extend coverage to carbon electrodes, as the two were treated as distinct inputs; however, the subsequent declaration of 17-5-1994 brought the disputed receipts within the rule. Once the credit was found validly taken, the foundation for the penalty also fell away, and the penalty was held unsustainable in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 189 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85504</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on carbon electrodes and nipples was held admissible where the later declaration filed under Rule 57G(5) covered the inputs received during the relevant period. A declaration for graphite electrodes was not enough to extend coverage to carbon electrodes, as the two were treated as distinct inputs; however, the subsequent declaration of 17-5-1994 brought the disputed receipts within the rule. Once the credit was found validly taken, the foundation for the penalty also fell away, and the penalty was held unsustainable in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>