<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision that printing on aluminium foil does not amount to manufacturing a new product under the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. The printed foil was not considered a distinct product attracting duty liability, aligning with previous case law interpretations. Therefore, the appeals filed by the Department were dismissed, ruling that no manufacturing activity was involved in printing on aluminium foil.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision that printing on aluminium foil does not amount to manufacturing a new product under the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. The printed foil was not considered a distinct product attracting duty liability, aligning with previous case law interpretations. Therefore, the appeals filed by the Department were dismissed, ruling that no manufacturing activity was involved in printing on aluminium foil.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>