<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85489</link>
    <description>Batteries fitted with generating sets were treated as admissible Modvat inputs under Rule 57A because they were an integral and necessary component for the sets to function effectively. The department&#039;s own treatment of the batteries as part of the assessable value supported the position that they were not mere accessories, and no evidence showed that generating sets were supplied without them. On that basis, duty-paid batteries qualified for credit, and the disallowance of Modvat credit was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:00:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85489</link>
      <description>Batteries fitted with generating sets were treated as admissible Modvat inputs under Rule 57A because they were an integral and necessary component for the sets to function effectively. The department&#039;s own treatment of the batteries as part of the assessable value supported the position that they were not mere accessories, and no evidence showed that generating sets were supplied without them. On that basis, duty-paid batteries qualified for credit, and the disallowance of Modvat credit was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>