https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85449 The Tribunal upheld the classification of products under Item No. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, in addition to duty under Item No. 25, as the goods were tailor-made for individual customers as per specific orders and designs, ready for use without further processing. The Tribunal emphasized that incidental processes to casting did not change the dutiability of the goods, in line with Supreme Court judgments. The appeal challenging the classification was rejected, affirming the two-stage duty liability on the identified components for Railway Wagons. en-us Wed, 15 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:14:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85449 The Tribunal upheld the classification of products under Item No. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, in addition to duty under Item No. 25, as the goods were tailor-made for individual customers as per specific orders and designs, ready for use without further processing. The Tribunal emphasized that incidental processes to casting did not change the dutiability of the goods, in line with Supreme Court judgments. The appeal challenging the classification was rejected, affirming the two-stage duty liability on the identified components for Railway Wagons. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85449