<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85447</link>
    <description>Distribution discount allowed to distribution-oriented dealers was treated as a permissible trade discount for excise valuation because it was known before removal, passed on through invoices, and there was no evidence of any flow back or extra-commercial consideration. The record also showed no indication that the distributors performed advertising, publicity, after-sale service, or other sales-promotion functions on behalf of the manufacturer. Differential discounts to different classes of buyers were therefore acceptable, and the deduction was upheld as part of the terms of sale and established practice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85447</link>
      <description>Distribution discount allowed to distribution-oriented dealers was treated as a permissible trade discount for excise valuation because it was known before removal, passed on through invoices, and there was no evidence of any flow back or extra-commercial consideration. The record also showed no indication that the distributors performed advertising, publicity, after-sale service, or other sales-promotion functions on behalf of the manufacturer. Differential discounts to different classes of buyers were therefore acceptable, and the deduction was upheld as part of the terms of sale and established practice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>