<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 265 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85435</link>
    <description>Imported used lubricating oil described in the import documents as waste oil was treated as hazardous waste under the EXIM Policy and the Hazardous Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989, because the record showed no reliable basis to distinguish used oil from waste oil for policy purposes. The transitory protection under Para 5 of the EXIM Policy, 1992-97 was unavailable since no firm pre-existing contractual commitment, such as a binding letter of credit or equivalent arrangement, was established before the policy change. Confiscation was sustained, while the redemption fine was reduced and the personal penalties were maintained as reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:32:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 265 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85435</link>
      <description>Imported used lubricating oil described in the import documents as waste oil was treated as hazardous waste under the EXIM Policy and the Hazardous Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989, because the record showed no reliable basis to distinguish used oil from waste oil for policy purposes. The transitory protection under Para 5 of the EXIM Policy, 1992-97 was unavailable since no firm pre-existing contractual commitment, such as a binding letter of credit or equivalent arrangement, was established before the policy change. Confiscation was sustained, while the redemption fine was reduced and the personal penalties were maintained as reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>