<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 289 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants concerning the classification of electrodes, discounts claimed, show cause notices, time bar issues, and handling charges deduction. The Tribunal found that the show cause notices for duty recovery were not valid, criticized the Collector (Appeals) for not issuing proper notices, and upheld the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision on merits regarding assessment on invoice value and handling charges deduction. The appellants&#039; arguments were supported by legal precedents, resulting in the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeals and confirmation of the appellants&#039; positions on various issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:58:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 289 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants concerning the classification of electrodes, discounts claimed, show cause notices, time bar issues, and handling charges deduction. The Tribunal found that the show cause notices for duty recovery were not valid, criticized the Collector (Appeals) for not issuing proper notices, and upheld the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision on merits regarding assessment on invoice value and handling charges deduction. The appellants&#039; arguments were supported by legal precedents, resulting in the dismissal of the department&#039;s appeals and confirmation of the appellants&#039; positions on various issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>