<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 138 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals, upholding the decision of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Chandigarh. The appeal by the Electricity Board was allowed as the coils manufactured by the Board were found to lack marketability, thus not meeting the definition of &quot;goods&quot; under the Act. The order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi, was set aside due to a violation of natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 138 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals, upholding the decision of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Chandigarh. The appeal by the Electricity Board was allowed as the coils manufactured by the Board were found to lack marketability, thus not meeting the definition of &quot;goods&quot; under the Act. The order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi, was set aside due to a violation of natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>