<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85402</link>
    <description>Where a refund under a concessional duty order was quantified by the Department, the Tribunal held that no further order was needed on the alleged shortfall; instead, the Assistant Collector was directed to issue an appealable quantification order so the assessee could pursue normal appellate remedies. On claims for additional consequential relief under other Notifications, the Tribunal noted that those entitlements were not part of the earlier adjudication and, because the Customs authorities had complied with the final order already passed, no further directions were issued. The miscellaneous application was therefore disposed of without granting additional relief beyond the quantified refund process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:11:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 170 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85402</link>
      <description>Where a refund under a concessional duty order was quantified by the Department, the Tribunal held that no further order was needed on the alleged shortfall; instead, the Assistant Collector was directed to issue an appealable quantification order so the assessee could pursue normal appellate remedies. On claims for additional consequential relief under other Notifications, the Tribunal noted that those entitlements were not part of the earlier adjudication and, because the Customs authorities had complied with the final order already passed, no further directions were issued. The miscellaneous application was therefore disposed of without granting additional relief beyond the quantified refund process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>