<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85369</link>
    <description>Where the factory-gate wholesale price is ascertainable, freight, delivery, transportation and transit insurance incurred after removal of goods are excluded from the assessable value under central excise valuation rules. Separate recovery of these post-removal expenses from buyers does not change their character, and a buyer taking delivery at the factory gate is not treated differently from a buyer requiring delivery elsewhere for this purpose. The manufacturer may recover such incidental charges separately without their inclusion in assessable value, so the valuation must exclude them and a demand based on inclusion cannot stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 154 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85369</link>
      <description>Where the factory-gate wholesale price is ascertainable, freight, delivery, transportation and transit insurance incurred after removal of goods are excluded from the assessable value under central excise valuation rules. Separate recovery of these post-removal expenses from buyers does not change their character, and a buyer taking delivery at the factory gate is not treated differently from a buyer requiring delivery elsewhere for this purpose. The manufacturer may recover such incidental charges separately without their inclusion in assessable value, so the valuation must exclude them and a demand based on inclusion cannot stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>