<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 147 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85362</link>
    <description>Rivets supplied by buyers were treated as bought-out items and not as a component or part of clutch facings or brakelinings. Because their function was only to fix the goods to a system or chassis, they did not form part of the manufactured goods for valuation purposes. On that basis, the value of the rivets was held not includible in the assessable value of clutch facings or brakelinings, and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 147 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85362</link>
      <description>Rivets supplied by buyers were treated as bought-out items and not as a component or part of clutch facings or brakelinings. Because their function was only to fix the goods to a system or chassis, they did not form part of the manufactured goods for valuation purposes. On that basis, the value of the rivets was held not includible in the assessable value of clutch facings or brakelinings, and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>